|
Research Grant Application Form
Research Grant Policy
Systematic Review Introduction
Systematic Review Application Form
Systematic Review Clinical Guidelines Application Form

|
|
To download the Research Grant Application Form:
In
MS Word 97/2000 format, click here.
In PDF format, click here.
|
click
here to download
Acrobat Reader to read a PDF file |
Revised December 2004
Click here for the Research Grant Policy.
.
Adopted December 2004
Click here
for more information on Systematic Reviews.
To download the Systematic Review Application Form:
In
MS Word 97/2000 format, click here.
In PDF format, click here.
|
click
here to download
Acrobat Reader to read a PDF file |
Adopted December 2004
Applications for Systematic Review
Declaration
The Occupational Therapists’ Registration Board in keeping with its
strategic objectives, seeks to promote and provide the funding
assistance for education and research in Occupational Therapy.
.
Background
A review of the Board’s research grant guidelines within the context of
current Occupational Therapy practice within Western Australia indicated
that further categories of research and evaluation were required to
widen opportunities for therapists to extend the development of the
profession. In line with current procedures the grant would be
controlled by the Board and would only be available to occupational
therapists registered and practising in Western Australia. The new
categories are in addition to the existing research grant.
Objectives
- To promote optimum quality in occupational therapy practice
- To provide opportunities for occupational therapy practitioners
to develop clinical practice guidelines.
- To ensure financial accountability procedures are followed.
Policy/Procedures
| 1. |
The Principal Project Coordinator
(PPC) nominated should be an occupational therapist.
|
| 2. |
Applicants must follow the
template for Clinical Guidelines Grant Applications when
submitting a proposal.
|
| 3. |
A one page annual report of
Project progress is required by the Board, with the project
activities, timeline and budget updated.
|
| 4. |
In the case of the PPC being
unable to continue involvement with the nominated project, the
Board must be immediately informed. The Board would determine
whether the project can be continued successfully under the
direction of a new PPC who fits the appropriate selection
criteria, or whether support for the project will be terminated.
In the case of needing to terminate the project, the retiring
PPC should send a synopsis of the progress of the project to
this point in time; no further funding will then be forwarded.
|
| 5. |
A separate cost centre using the
name of the project, rather than the Project Coordinator, is to
be established by the researcher’s organisation prior to the
receipt of research funds. The Board would need to be informed
whether the organisation administering the funds proposes to
charge administration fees. If fees are to be charged, and if
these are significant, the Board may elect to establish a cost
centre within its own records to disburse the funds. An itemised
account of expenditures must be forwarded with the annual
report.
|
| 6. |
Funds required for substantial
purchases other than identified in the project grant application
must be forwarded to the Board for approval, as grants are
primarily given to free up or purchase staff time to facilitate
the successful outcome of the project.
|
| 7. |
Whilst an annual progress report
to the Board is a requirement, the Board has the prerogative to
inquire regarding the project should it wish to do so at any
time.
|
| 8. |
As the aim of the grants is to
further the profession of occupational therapy, the clear
dissemination process of the project outcomes is an essential
component of the acceptance of a Board grant.
|
| 9. |
Applicants are required to include
an acknowledgment to the Board concerning the Project grant, in
their final reports on the title page.
|
| 10. |
Applicants are required to include
their initial proposal document with the final report. The Board
requires seven (7) bound copies of the final report. This should
meet appropriate standards of presentation, including
referencing, format and appropriate cover page.
|
| 11. |
Grant applicants with limited
Project experience must have identified an experienced person/s
to assist in methodology and appropriate analysis.
|
| 12. |
Grant applicants should provide
the Board with a letter of support from the organisation backing
the applicant, confirming that the organisation is aware of and
supports the proposed Project. |
|
|